The Year the Earth Stood Still
The following commentary was first published in âMaster Investorâ magazine in June 2020. It is republished here entirely unchanged.
First, the virus. Then the governmental overreaction. Now the backlash. At the end of May a German official, Stephen Kohn, blew the whistle on the established Covid-19 narrative, and leaked a 93-page report entitled Analysis of the crisis management. Among its key findings:
1.   "The dangerousness of Covid-19 was overestimated: probably at no point did the danger posed by the new virus go beyond the normal level."
2.   "The people who die from Corona are essentially those who would statistically die this year, because they have reached the end of their lives and their weakened bodies can no longer cope with any random everyday stress (incl. approximately 150 viruses currently in circulation).â
3. Â "Worldwide, within a quarter of a year, there has been no more than 250,000 deaths from Covid-19, compared to 1.5 million deaths [25,100 in Germany] during the influenza wave 2017/18."
4. Â "The danger is obviously no greater than that of many other viruses. There is no evidence that this was more than a false alarm. A reproach could go along these lines: During the Corona crisis the State has proved itself as one of the biggest producers of Fake News."
5. Â "The report focuses on the âmanifold and heavy consequences of the Corona measuresâ and warns that these are âgraveâ. More people are dying because of state-imposed Corona-measures than they are being killed by the virus."
6. Â "A Corona-focused German healthcare system is postponing life-saving surgery and delaying or reducing treatment for non-Corona patients."
7. Â "Therapeutic and preventive measures should never bring more harm than the illness itself. Their aim should be to protect the risk groups, without endangering the availability of medical care and the health of the whole population, as it is unfortunately occurringâ.
8. Â âWe in the scientific and medical praxis are experiencing the secondary damages of the Corona-measures on our patients on a daily basis.â
9. Â âWe therefore ask the Federal Ministry of the Interior, to comment upon our press release, and we hope for a pertinent discussion regarding the [Corona] measures, one that leads to the best possible solution for the whole populationâ.
The following day, the US entrepreneur JB Handley published a definitive guide to the accumulated governmental and medical mis-steps in handling the pandemic, most notably the lockdown itself. His executive summary is clear:
Knowing what we know today about COVID-19âs Infection Fatality Rate, asymmetric impact by age and medical condition, non-transmissibility by asymptomatic people and in outdoor settings, near-zero fatality rate for children, and the basic understanding of viruses through Farrâs law, locking down society was a bone-headed policy decision so devastating to society that historians may judge it as the all-time worst decision ever made. Worse, as these clear facts have become available, many policy-makers havenât shifted their positions, despite the fact that every hour under any stage of lockdown has a domino-effect of devastation to society. Meanwhile, the mediaâwith a few notable exceptionsâis oddly silent on all the good news. Luckily, an unexpected group of heroes across the political landscapeâmany of them doctors and scientistsâhave emerged to tell the truth, despite facing extreme criticism and censorship from an angry mob desperate to continue fighting an imaginary war.
The only thing more damning was his citation of the thoughts of Yoram Lass, former director of Israelâs Health Ministry:
It is the first epidemic in history which is accompanied by another epidemic â the virus of the social networks. These new media have brainwashed entire populations. What you get is fear and anxiety, and an inability to look at real data. And therefore you have all the ingredients for monstrous hysteria.. Compared to that rise, the draconian measures are of biblical proportions. Hundreds of millions of people are suffering. In developing countries many will die from starvation. In developed countries many will die from unemployment. Unemployment Is mortality. More people will die from the measures than from the virus. And the people who die from the measures are the breadwinners. They are younger. Among the people who die from coronavirus, the median age is often higher than the life expectancy of the population. What has been done is not proportionate. But people are afraid. People are brainwashed. They do not listen to the data. And that includes governments.
Joseph Tainter, in his book The collapse of complex societies concludes as follows:
Collapse is recurrent in human history; it is global in its occurrence; and it affects the spectrum of societies from simple foragers to great empires. Collapse is a matter of considerable importance to every member of a complex society, and seems to be of particular interest to many people today. Political decentralization has repercussions in economics, art, literature, and other cultural phenomena, but these are not its essence. Collapse is fundamentally a sudden, pronounced loss of an established level of sociopolitical complexity.
A complex society that has collapsed is suddenly smaller, simpler, less stratisfied, and less socially differentiated. Specialization decreases and there is less centralized control. The flow of information drops, people trade and interact less, and there is overall lower coordination among individuals and groups. Economic activity drops to a commensurate level, while the arts and literature experience such a quantitative decline that a dark age often ensues. Population levels tend to drop, and for those who are left the known world shrinks.
It is by no means clear that the Coronavirus Crisis of 2020 will cause widespread social collapse, but it is not as if the global economy or our modern culture and society were exactly in rude health in the days before the pandemic erupted. For years I have nursed doubts about the unsustainable build-up of government debt, for example â to levels which are now well and truly beyond the unpayable. The effect of Covid-19 has been, I would argue, to act like a time machine, accelerating us to the endgame of this global debt predicament.
If you accept the thesis that there is too much debt in the system (essentially, that the rest of the world has now turned into 1990âs no-growth deflationary Japan), then you must also accept the thesis that there can only be three ways of âreconcilingâ that debt. One is for government to engineer enough economic growth to keep the debt serviced. Good luck with that strategy in a year when US unemployment claims have already topped 42 million.
One is for governments to default on that debt. If you prefer more polite language, you can call it a âdebt jubileeâ or a reset, but it amounts to the same thing. Not least, the instantaneous bankruptcy of the entire global pension system. Not to mention the equivalent of Armageddon within a credit-based global economy.
So whatâs in Box Number Three ? Funnily enough, Box Number Three is the option to which all heavily indebted governments have resorted since the beginning of recorded time. Inflation. So why werenât central banks able to ignite inflation (in the prices of goods and services, at least) after eight years of ever more ridiculous Quantitative Easing ? Listen to this recent podcast with the financial historian Russell Napier, and the answer becomes clear. Central banks failed to spark ârealâ inflation after the Global Financial Crisis because while they were âfilling the bathtubâ in monetary terms, the commercial banks were essentially emptying it. But a) the combined fiscal and monetary stimulus in response to Covid-19 is truly monstrous (the Fed has already this year, in the space of two months, printed more than half of what it printed in the eight years following the Lehman Brothers collapse), and b) governments and central banks, this time around, are more likely to succeed in coercing the private banking system to join forces with them in the project to reflate. Unfortunately, that also means that financial repression is alive and well. So whatever happens to society, the answer for investors has barely changed form over the last few years. Do you own enough gold ?
Tim Price is co-manager of the VT Price Value Portfolio and author of âInvesting through the Looking Glass: a rational guide to irrational financial marketsâ. You can access a full archive of these weekly investment commentaries here. You can listen to our regular âState of the Marketsâ podcasts, with Paul Rodriguez of ThinkTrading.com, here. Email us: info@pricevaluepartners.com.
Price Value Partners manage investment portfolios for private clients. We also manage the VT Price Value Portfolio, an unconstrained global fund investing in Benjamin Graham-style value stocks and specialist managed funds.
Important Information
Price Value Partners Limited (PVP) acts as investment manager to its professional client VT Price Value Partners ICVC (the Fund). PVP is not in a marketing group with Valu-Trac Investment Management Limited who act as Authorised Corporate Director (ACD) to the Fund. PVP also acts as investment manager to private individuals, classified as both professional and retail clients. PVP makes this information available under its responsibilities as investment manager. PVP has approved the above information in accordance with Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and its Treating Customers Fairly policy (a copy of which is available on request). The ACD makes use of an exemption under the Financial Promotions Exemption Order to provide this information to investors (or potential investors) of the Fund. Accordingly, PVP has made this document available for your general information. You are encouraged to consider the risks detailed in the Fund prospectus and any investment management agreement originated by PVP and seek independent financial advice before acting. We have taken all reasonable steps to ensure the above content is correct at the time of publication. Any views expressed or interpretations given are those of the author personally. Please note that PVP is not responsible for the contents or reliability of any websites or blogs and linking to them should not be considered as an endorsement of any kind. If you no longer wish to receive these commentaries, please let us know and we will remove you from our distribution list, which is opt-in exclusively. We have no control over the availability of linked pages. Price Value Partners Ltd. is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, registered number 629623.
Brilliant analysis and a very timely reminder to seriously question orthodoxy and that gold is money, everything else credit of ever diminishing value.
Excellent summary of a societal disaster that too few can see through. My wife sisters in the UK are both well educated and as stubborn as my wife. However she does not raise the question of CV19 and related issues as both fully believe the government line and believe the lockdowns / masks were necessary to save a million lives. So topic is ignored.
.....and yes, the question back then was "Do you have enough gold?" The question now is will the "powers that be" even allow gold to be an answer? The paper price and the physical price seem to be diverging for gold and silver. I don't think ownership of gold will be outlawed, but I do think the taxes on gold profits may be substantially increased. In the USA gold is taxed as a collectible at ~28%; I expect that to maybe even double if and when gold soars to unheard of heights. Only those that "semi-permanently" hold it until such times as taxes are lowered again may make out.
Silver seems a better bet as its price rise may dwarf that of gold in coming years. Platinum is now being recommended by my Swiss Advisors as they don't envision confiscatory taxes or ownership restrictions on that rare precious metal.